BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:-//ABAA National Conference - ECPv6.15.17.1//NONSGML v1.0//EN CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:PUBLISH X-WR-CALNAME:ABAA National Conference X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://abaaconference.com X-WR-CALDESC:Events for ABAA National Conference REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H X-Robots-Tag:noindex X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:America/New_York BEGIN:DAYLIGHT TZOFFSETFROM:-0500 TZOFFSETTO:-0400 TZNAME:EDT DTSTART:20250309T070000 END:DAYLIGHT BEGIN:STANDARD TZOFFSETFROM:-0400 TZOFFSETTO:-0500 TZNAME:EST DTSTART:20251102T060000 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT TZOFFSETFROM:-0500 TZOFFSETTO:-0400 TZNAME:EDT DTSTART:20260308T070000 END:DAYLIGHT BEGIN:STANDARD TZOFFSETFROM:-0400 TZOFFSETTO:-0500 TZNAME:EST DTSTART:20261101T060000 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT TZOFFSETFROM:-0500 TZOFFSETTO:-0400 TZNAME:EDT DTSTART:20270314T070000 END:DAYLIGHT BEGIN:STANDARD TZOFFSETFROM:-0400 TZOFFSETTO:-0500 TZNAME:EST DTSTART:20271107T060000 END:STANDARD END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T080000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260506T160000 DTSTAMP:20260505T094321 CREATED:20260225T192333Z LAST-MODIFIED:20260408T162558Z UID:10000445-1777968000-1778083200@abaaconference.com SUMMARY:WUFI Pro Computer Modeling Workshop DESCRIPTION:WUFI Pro Computer Modeling Workshop\nFor Wall Design and Performance – Version 7\n(Heat and Moisture Transfer in Building Envelopes) \n \n \n \n \n \n Tuesday\, MAY 5 to Wednesday\, MAY 6\, 20268:00AM-4:00PMMirage\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n This intensive 2-day hands-on workshop teaches participants how to use WUFI® Pro Version 7\, the industry-standard hygrothermal modeling software for analyzing heat and moisture transfer in building envelopes. \nLed by Dr. Achilles Karagiozis and André Desjarlais\, the workshop demonstrates the latest strategies for building envelope design with a strong emphasis on heat and moisture control. Participants will learn how to use WUFI® in conjunction with ASHRAE Standard 160 (Design Criteria for Moisture Control in Buildings). \nThe session is limited to 30 participants to ensure personalized instruction. \nLearn More and Register \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n What You’ll Learn\n\n\n\n\nParticipants will gain practical experience in: \n\nBasic building envelope design principles\nHeat and mass transfer fundamentals\nValidation of modern hygrothermal simulation tools\nRequired input data and accuracy considerations\nDo’s and Don’ts of WUFI® Pro\nPerformance prediction and interpreting results\nMold growth prediction using new post-processing modules\nBoundary and surface conditions\nAnalysis of material properties\nLimitations of modeling\nFuture standards and guidelines\n\n\n\nAdditional hands-on learning includes: \n\nInstalling and navigating WUFI® software\nModeling wall and roof assemblies for specific climates\nIntegrating NOAA weather data\nEvaluating material layers and assemblies\nGroup modeling project and presentation of results\nExporting files and creating simulation movies\n\n\n\n\n\n  \nThis 2-day workshop is being held in conjunction with and at the same time as the Air Barrier Association of America (ABAA)’s annual conference. This workshop is co-sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) through Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) in collaboration with the Fraunhofer-Institut für Bauphysik (IBP) and co-sponsored by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory and National Building Science Co. (NBSC) of Oklahoma. URL:https://abaaconference.com/event/wufi-pro-computer-modeling-workshop-for-wall-design-and-performance/ LOCATION:Mirage\, MN CATEGORIES:Installer and Auditor Training ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://abaaconference.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/02/WUFI-Training.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T080000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260507T160000 DTSTAMP:20260505T094321 CREATED:20260120T084230Z LAST-MODIFIED:20260424T214214Z UID:10000045-1777968000-1778169600@abaaconference.com SUMMARY:Self-Adhered & Fluid Applied Installer Certification Training Course DESCRIPTION:Presentation Overview\n \n \n \n \n \n Tuesday\, MAY 5 to Thursday MAY 7\, 20268:00AM-4:00PM\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n DESCRIPTION: \nThis course is designed to teach experienced installers how to create an Air Barrier using Self-Adhered and Fluid Applied materials. This course includes instruction on everything from selecting proper materials\, substrate preparation\, application technology\, troubleshooting\, and hands-on training. \nNot an Installer?  \nABAA courses are open to everyone and are a great training opportunity for all\, including General Contractors\, Suppliers\, Manufacturers sales rep\, Architectural Reps\, and anyone in the construction industry. There is NO experience needed to attend one of our great training courses. \nInterested in Certification? \nSelf-Adhered and Fluid Applied installer training is designed to teach experienced installers how to create an Air Barrier using Self Adhered and Fluid Applied materials. This course includes instruction on everything from selecting proper materials\, substrate preparation\, application technology\, troubleshooting and hands-on training. \nFor certification purposes\, a minimum of 3000 hours of work experience either directly with air barriers or in applicable related trade experience is required.\n \nFor companies seeking to become ABAA Accredited Contractor\, it is ABAA policy that each company has at least 1 person trained in an ABAA Installer Training Course and certified as an ABAA Level 3 Installer\, and at least 1 person trained in the Quality Assurance Program Administrator Course.\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Due to limited capacity\, ABAA’s training courses at the upcoming conference are now full.We encourage you to join the waitlist to receive updates on availability and explore additional training opportunities. \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Join Waitlist URL:https://abaaconference.com/event/self-adhered-fluid-applied-installer-certification-training-course/ LOCATION:Regency Room CATEGORIES:Installer and Auditor Training ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://abaaconference.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/02/Training-SAFL.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T080000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260507T160000 DTSTAMP:20260505T094321 CREATED:20260120T084524Z LAST-MODIFIED:20260424T214241Z UID:10000046-1777968000-1778169600@abaaconference.com SUMMARY:Field Auditor Training Course DESCRIPTION:Presentation Overview\n \n \n \n \n \n Tuesday\, MAY 5 to Thursday MAY 7\, 20268:00AM-4:00PM\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n The Field Audit training course consists of both theory and practical instruction. \nThe classroom portion of training emphasizes understanding the need for and function of an air barrier assembly\, the ability to inspect installation and review materials for compliance with specifications\, ABAA requirements\, and manufacturer requirements\, the ability to confirm proper installation through on-site testing and the documentation required throughout the air barrier installation process. \nThe classroom is divided into three main modules. The first\, principles and theory\, provides an introduction to air barriers\, building science\, codes and standards as well as installer ethics and responsibilities. The second module focuses on procedure\, teaching participants about testing and audits and proper documentation and reporting. The final module of the classroom section is an overview of building enclosure construction. Participants will learn about material selection\, application technology\, substrate conditions and the continuity/compatibility of components. \nThe practical portion of the training module is carried out on a job site\, or on a mock-up where an authorized ABAA representative will instruct the candidates on audit process for air barrier assemblies. \nCourse Length: 3 Days \nDescription\nThe role of the Field Auditor is to perform quality assurance audits of air barrier assemblies on new commercial and institutional construction projects during installation. Complete audit reports\, document audits with photos\, and address specific areas which have noted deficiencies and require corrective action(s). \nThis course is open to everyone with no prerequisites required. However\, it is a mandatory step for those seeking to become a licensed field auditor for ABAA’s Quality Assurance Program (QAP).\n \n \n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Due to limited capacity\, ABAA’s training courses at the upcoming conference are now full.We encourage you to join the waitlist to receive updates on availability and explore additional training opportunities. \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Join Waitlist URL:https://abaaconference.com/event/field-auditor-training-course/ LOCATION:Regency Room CATEGORIES:Installer and Auditor Training ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://abaaconference.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/02/Training-FA.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T080000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260507T160000 DTSTAMP:20260505T094321 CREATED:20260120T085033Z LAST-MODIFIED:20260424T214310Z UID:10000047-1777968000-1778169600@abaaconference.com SUMMARY:Spray Polyurethane Foam Installer Certification Training Course DESCRIPTION:Presentation Overview\n \n \n \n \n \n Tuesday\, MAY 5 to Thursday MAY 7\, 20268:00AM-4:00PM\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n DESCRIPTION: \nThis course is designed to teach experienced installers how to create an Air Barrier using Spray Polyurethane Foam materials. This course includes instruction on everything from selecting proper materials\, substrate preparation\, application technology\, troubleshooting\, and hands-on training. \nNot an Installer?  \nABAA courses are open to everyone and are a great training opportunity for all\, including General Contractors\, Suppliers\, Manufacturers sales rep\, Architectural Reps\, and anyone in the construction industry. There is NO experience needed to attend one of our great training courses. \nInterested in Certification? \nFor certification purposes\, a minimum of 3000 hours of work experience (a minimum of at least 1\,500 hours directly in SPF experience is required)  with air barriers or in applicable related trade experience is required. \nCompletion the American Chemistry Council (ACC)’s Center for the Polyurethanes Industry (CPI)’s Spray Polyurethane Foam Chemical Health and Safety Training. \n \nFor companies seeking to become ABAA Accredited Contractor\, it is ABAA policy that each company has at least 1 person trained in an ABAA Installer Training Course and certified as an ABAA Level 3 Installer\, and at least 1 person trained in the Quality Assurance Program Administrator Course.\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Due to limited capacity\, ABAA’s training courses at the upcoming conference are now full.We encourage you to join the waitlist to receive updates on availability and explore additional training opportunities. \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Join Waitlist URL:https://abaaconference.com/event/sprayed-polyurethane-foam-installer-certification-training-course/ LOCATION:Regency Room CATEGORIES:Installer and Auditor Training ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://abaaconference.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/02/Training-SPF.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T083000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T093000 DTSTAMP:20260505T094321 CREATED:20260114T005335Z LAST-MODIFIED:20260126T155503Z UID:10000024-1777969800-1777973400@abaaconference.com SUMMARY:Code Compliance Paths for Air Leakage Through the Building Envelope DESCRIPTION:Presentation Overview\n \n \n \n \n \n Tuesday\, MAY 5\, 8:30AM – 9:30AMNicollet Ballroom\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n In 2012\, the International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) introduced the requirement for a continuous air barrier throughout the building thermal envelope. At the time\, there was little guidance on how to verify that the requirement\, but with each new version of the energy code\, provisions are incorporated that expand on acceptable methods for compliance and verification procedures. \nOne compliance path within the IECC is through ASHRAE Standard 90.1. Similar to the IECC\, ASHRAE 90.1 has also progressively expanded requirements for air leakage control and verification\, though the approaches differ slightly. Depending on project goals and Owner specific requirements\, compliance with stretch codes\, such as the International Green Construction Code (IgCC)\, or Passive House standards may also apply. Moreover\, state and local jurisdictions can add to or modify these requirements\, further affecting air leakage limits and verification methods. \nAs codes have evolved\, there is an emphasis not only on the design of the air barrier\, but also on verification during construction\, including through Whole Building Air Leakage Testing. Navigating there varying compliance paths required careful coordination among design and construction teams to ensure performance requirements are met from design through completion of the project. \nThis session will discuss the importance of a continuous air barrier and its influence on heat and moisture movement through wall assemblies. It will review different compliance paths within recent versions of the IECC and ASHRAE 90.1\, highlight key differences in the IgCC\, and discuss how each approach can be effectively integrated into the design and construction process with the project team. \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Learning Objectives: \n\nDiscuss the requirements for air barrier material and impacts on performance of an assembly\nReview code compliance paths as they relate to air leakage in recent versions of the energy code and identify key changes as the code has evolved.\nDiscuss considerations for implementing various compliance paths.\nIdentify ways to coordinate with the project team to implement design and construction phase requirements.\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Jodi Knorowski\, WDP & Associates\n Jodi Knorowski\, P.E. is a Senior Engineer with WDP & Associates Consulting Engineers\, Inc. in Charlottesville\, Virginia. She provides professional design and construction administration services focused on the investigation and repairs of building envelope failures in existing structures\, as well as consulting services for new construction projects. \nJodi has extensive experience evaluating the effects of air and moisture movement through building envelopes. She utilizes in-situ data logging sensors and diagnostic testing to assess each project’s unique conditions and determine modeling assumptions that are representative of actual conditions for use in further analysis. Her fieldwork includes investigating façade failures\, air leakage\, water infiltration\, and other moisture-related performance issues. \nIn addition to her project work\, Jodi contributes to the advancement of industry standards and best practices for building envelope performance. She is an active member of ASHRAE SSPC 160\, Criteria for Moisture-Control Design Analysis in Buildings; TC 4.4\, Building Materials and Building Envelope Performance; and TC 1.12\, Moisture Management in Buildings. URL:https://abaaconference.com/event/code-compliance-paths-for-air-leakage/ LOCATION:Nicollet Ballroom CATEGORIES:Tuesday May 5 ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://abaaconference.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/Foundational-Jodi.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T083000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T093000 DTSTAMP:20260505T094321 CREATED:20260114T011608Z LAST-MODIFIED:20260126T155347Z UID:10000025-1777969800-1777973400@abaaconference.com SUMMARY:Catastrophic Failures and the Net Effect of Design and Construction Errors on Moisture Management DESCRIPTION:Presentation Overview\n \n \n \n \n \n Tuesday\, MAY 5\, 8:30AM – 9:30AMLakeshore Ballroom\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n This seminar explores how seemingly minor design and construction flaws can compound into major building and HVAC system failures\, often with costly consequences. While individual defects may appear insignificant in isolation\, their combined effect across multiple systems frequently leads to catastrophic moisture problems\, degraded indoor air quality\, premature equipment failure\, and diminished building resilience. \nDrawing on forensic engineering investigations\, the session presents real-world case studies that demonstrate how errors in coordination between the building envelope and HVAC systems can undermine moisture management strategies. These cases highlight how the lack of integrated design review\, inadequate field oversight\, poorly understood continuous air and thermal barriers\, and the absence of HVAC capacity control or supplemental dehumidification can contribute to systemic failure\, particularly in hot\, humid\, and mixed climate zones. \nThe presentation identifies critical defects such as unsealed penetrations in ceiling planes\, misplaced vapor retarders\, and ductwork located in unconditioned spaces\, each contributing to latent moisture accumulation and mold growth. In some cases\, air conditioning systems operated as designed with capacity control\, but within flawed enclosures and unbalanced air distribution systems that could not manage moisture loads or prevent air leakage. In others\, misapplied controls or improper setpoints worsened envelope weaknesses. \nAttendees will take away actionable insights to help project teams identify vulnerabilities early in the design and construction process and apply practical\, risk-reducing strategies before occupancy. Emphasis is placed on the critical interface between envelope assemblies and mechanical systems\, the importance of design-phase diagnostics\, and the value of post occupancy feedback. \nAs extreme weather\, energy volatility\, and resiliency requirements become more central to building performance\, these lessons are vital. This session equips professionals with the tools and understanding needed to prevent moisture-driven failures and build more resilient\, durable structures. \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Learning Objectives: \n\nRecognize how compounding design and construction flaws contribute to major building and HVAC system failures affecting moisture control and resilience.\nInterpret case study evidence to identify key failure mechanisms and understand the role of building envelope and HVAC interactions in catastrophic system outcomes.\nApply forensic insights to strengthen early-phase design reviews\, improve construction oversight\, and implement risk mitigation strategies for climate and energy resilient buildings.\nIdentify critical building code requirements related to air sealing and minimum air leakage performance for building enclosures.\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Donald B. Snell\, Building Forensics Group\n Donald B. Snell\, PE\, is a senior forensic engineer and vice president at Building Forensics Group. He is licensed in Florida\, Pennsylvania\, Georgia\, Virginia\, and South Carolina. In Florida\, he also holds state certifications in mechanical contracting and as a mold assessor. He is a Certified Indoor Environmental Consultant (CIEC) with the American Council for Accredited Certification and a Certified Indoor Air Quality Professional (CIAQP) with the Association of Energy Engineers. \nMr. Snell is an active member of ASHRAE. He served as standards subcommittee chair for Technical Committee 1.12\, Moisture Management in Buildings (2018–2025)\, and is a member of the National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES). \nHis practice focuses on HVAC design and performance; prevention and diagnosis of moisture problems; building air leakage testing and diagnostics; indoor air quality assessment; and mitigation strategies for HVAC and IAQ deficiencies. Through case work across climates and building types\, he has found that moisture and indoor air quality failures rarely stem from a single cause. Instead\, they result from interacting conditions such as HVAC and building envelope design and construction defects\, discontinuities between scopes of work\, and geometric complexities introduced during project execution. These issues often require coordinated and multidisciplinary solutions to resolve effectively. URL:https://abaaconference.com/event/catastrophic-failures-and-the-net-effect/ LOCATION:Lakeshore Ballroom CATEGORIES:Tuesday May 5 ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://abaaconference.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/IA-Donald.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T093000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T100000 DTSTAMP:20260505T094321 CREATED:20260120T090332Z LAST-MODIFIED:20260128T181507Z UID:10000050-1777973400-1777975200@abaaconference.com SUMMARY:Exhibit Hall Open & Break DESCRIPTION:Tuesday\, MAY 5\, 9:30AM-10:00AM URL:https://abaaconference.com/event/exhibit-hall-open-break/ LOCATION:Nicollet Ballroom & Promenade CATEGORIES:Tuesday May 5 ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://abaaconference.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/Break-Exhibit-Hall-Open.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T100000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T110000 DTSTAMP:20260505T094321 CREATED:20260116T023409Z LAST-MODIFIED:20260126T155320Z UID:10000027-1777975200-1777978800@abaaconference.com SUMMARY:Sealing the Deal: A Holistic Framework for Reliably Achieving High-Performance Airtightness DESCRIPTION:Presentation Overview\n \n \n \n \n \n Tuesday\, MAY 5\, 10:00AM-11:00AMNicollet Ballroom\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n High-performance airtightness is fundamental for climate resilient buildings\, reducing energy consumption\, enhancing comfort\, and improving indoor air quality. While codes increasingly mandate tighter envelopes\, reliably achieving and verifying stringent targets\, especially in complex structures\, remains challenging. Supported by examples of field testing\, this abstract outline a holistic approach for consistently delivering high performance air tightness. We emphasize an integrated approach with a focus on three key elements. \n1. Design: Identifying key design objectives early on in design and prioritizing early\, collaborative design to define clear air barrier strategies and meticulous detailing for critical junctions and penetrations\, which are common leakage points. Choosing robust\, durable\, and compatible air barrier components\, considering their performance at interfaces (e.g.\, wall-roof\, window transitions) and long-term resilience. Articulating the design intent in project documents and specifications. \n2. Build: Defining the role of the air barrier supervisor and implementing rigorous site management\, continuous installer training\, and phased inspections. Leveraging the mockups to improve the quality of the installation and reduce the risk of non-compliance. \n3. Confirm: This includes leveraging diagnostic tools like smoke pencils and infrared thermography during construction\, rather than solely at project completion\, to catch issues early. Selection of an appropriate test method to demonstrate compliance. \nBy embracing this comprehensive strategy – integrating robust design\, skilled execution\, continuous quality control\, and rigorous testing – teams can reliably deliver highly airtight building enclosures\, contributing significantly to a more climate resilient built environment. \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Learning Objectives: \n\nDescribe why airtightness is important.\nIdentify the importance of the air barrier system as it relates to building enclosure design.\nIdentify the three key elements of a high-performance airtight construction.\nIdentify the responsibility of an air barrier supervisor.\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Sherman Wai\, RDH Building Science\n Sherman’s focus is on building energy modelling\, thermal modelling\, testing\, and field review for Passive House design and certification. In the field\, Sherman conducts site reviews to ensure Passive House compliance\, including thermal bypass review\, airtightness testing\, and ventilation system commissioning. In addition to his knowledge of Passive House requirements\, Sherman is very well-acquainted with the airtightness testing requirements for BC Energy Step Code compliance. URL:https://abaaconference.com/event/sealing-the-deal-a-holistic-framework-for-reliably-achieving-high-performance-airtightness/ LOCATION:Nicollet Ballroom CATEGORIES:Tuesday May 5 ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://abaaconference.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/Foundational-Sherman.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T100000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T110000 DTSTAMP:20260505T094321 CREATED:20260120T001300Z LAST-MODIFIED:20260126T155239Z UID:10000032-1777975200-1777978800@abaaconference.com SUMMARY:Designing and Detailing Air Barrier Connections at Storefronts and Curtainwalls DESCRIPTION:Presentation Overview\n \n \n \n \n \n Tuesday\, MAY 5\, 10:00AM-11:00AMLakeshore Ballroom\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n As building energy codes become increasingly stringent\, improving the building enclosure to reduce air infiltration and thermal losses has become essential. One of the most common sources of uncontrolled air leakage is the transition between the air barrier and fenestrations or other wall openings. Although air barriers have been required by the International Building Code (IBC) for some time\, the design documents often still do not provide continuity or redundancy in the connections. Frequently\, discontinuities are related to a lack of understanding of the differences in the moisture management systems and primary seal locations for each system. This presentation will explore the design and detailing of air barrier connections at fenestrations\, highlighting how the different fenestration systems affect detailing. \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Learning Objectives: \n\nIdentify common sources of air leakage at curtain wall and storefront interfaces and explain their impact on overall building performance.\nEvaluate current industry standards and best practices for detailing air barrier transitions.\nRecognize the importance of early design coordination among manufacturers\, designers\, and contractors to achieve continuous air barrier systems.\nApply design and detailing strategies that improve product compatibility\, constructability\, and airtightness at fenestration openings.\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Derek Ziese\, Gale Associates\n Derek Ziese\, AIA\, PE\, BECxP is a registered architect and engineer at Gale Associates\, Inc.\, with over 15 years of experience in the design\, peer review\, construction\, and commissioning of high-performance building enclosure systems for new and historic buildings. His background in design and construction informs his practical approach to enclosure consulting. Derek collaborates with owners\, architects\, and contractors to develop façade strategies that balance performance and constructability. He has presented at ABAA and other industry conferences on topics related to building enclosure design and field performance. URL:https://abaaconference.com/event/designing-and-detailing-air-barrier-connections-at-storefronts-and-curtainwalls/ LOCATION:Lakeshore Ballroom CATEGORIES:Tuesday May 5 ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://abaaconference.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/IA-Derek.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T110000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T111500 DTSTAMP:20260505T094321 CREATED:20260120T090449Z LAST-MODIFIED:20260128T181512Z UID:10000051-1777978800-1777979700@abaaconference.com SUMMARY:Exhibit Hall Open & Break DESCRIPTION:Tuesday\, MAY 5\, 11:00AM-11:15AM URL:https://abaaconference.com/event/exhibit-hall-open-break-2/ LOCATION:Nicollet Ballroom & Promenade CATEGORIES:Tuesday May 5 ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://abaaconference.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/Break-Exhibit-Hall-Open.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T111500 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T121500 DTSTAMP:20260505T094321 CREATED:20260116T031047Z LAST-MODIFIED:20260126T155140Z UID:10000028-1777979700-1777983300@abaaconference.com SUMMARY:From the Window to the Wall - Bringing Together Heat\, Air and Moisture Control at Openings in the Enclosure DESCRIPTION:Presentation Overview\n \n \n \n \n \n Tuesday\, MAY 5\, 11:15AM – 12:15PMNicollet Ballroom\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n This presentation will be 60 minutes on high performance enclosure design and how to navigate cladding and glazing support while maximizing building energy efficiency and structural longevity. Modern exterior enclosures are complex systems that need to factor in air and vapor control layers\, insulation in multiple locations within the assembly\, and robust structural support for glazing and cladding. With the variables of climate\, energy code\, and construction type in the mix\, it can be overwhelming to try and put all the pieces together. In this presentation we will look at some ‘good\, better\, best’ exterior wall assemblies\, how cladding type affects vapor control layers\, tradeoffs that you may face based on construction type\, and finally\, what is the difference between a vapor retarder and an air barrier anyway? \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Learning Objectives: \n\nLearn how cladding type affects air and vapor control layers as well as cavity requirements for drainage and drying.\nUnderstand best practice for where to locate the line of glazing within the wall assembly and how to support glazing and cladding in both combustible and non-combustible construction types.\nLearn the difference between an air barrier\, a vapor barrier\, a vapor retarder\, and a water resistive barrier; and understand how to determine when more than one control layer is desirable and where they should be located.\nUnderstand best practices for how to flash openings to shed water while creating air tight openings for various claddings (i.e.: rainscreens vs. reservoir claddings\, etc.).\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Jessica Saravia\, DMAC Architecture and Interiors\n Jessica’s career has delved into every phase of design and construction\, and led to her current role as Technical Director at DMAC where she leads construction documentation\, administration\, and specification writing across project types\, sizes\, and programs. Her enthusiasm for design detailing is only rivaled by her investment in code knowledge and constructability. Jessica is passionate about building performance and building science. She is the current Chair of the Leadership Group for the National AIA Building Performance Knowledge Community. In addition\, she serves on the National AIA Codes and Standards Committee and as Vice Chair of the Chicago Chapter of the Building Enclosure Council.She lives in a 100-year-old house in Evanston with her husband\, three kids\, and two dogs. URL:https://abaaconference.com/event/from-the-window-to-the-wall-bringing-together-heat-air-and-moisture-control-at-openings-in-the-enclosure/ LOCATION:Nicollet Ballroom CATEGORIES:Tuesday May 5 ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://abaaconference.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/Foundational-Jessica.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T111500 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T121500 DTSTAMP:20260505T094321 CREATED:20260120T001847Z LAST-MODIFIED:20260126T155115Z UID:10000033-1777979700-1777983300@abaaconference.com SUMMARY:Building Enclosure Commissioning vs Enclosure Testing DESCRIPTION:Presentation Overview\n \n \n \n \n \n Tuesday\, MAY 5\, 11:15AM-12:15PMLakeshore Ballroom\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n As building performance expectations rise\, confusion often persists between Building Enclosure Commissioning (BECx) and Building Enclosure Testing (BET). While both serve to verify performance\, they are distinct processes that meet at key points in design and construction. This session clarifies the relationship between BET and BECx and shows how testing requirements should flow from the Owner’s Project Requirements (OPR) through design\, construction\, and final functional performance testing. Historically\, many project specifications reference outdated standards such as NIBS 3-2012 and ASHRAE Guideline 0-2005. The industry has since advanced: NIBS 3 has evolved into ASTM E2813\, and ASHRAE Guideline 0 is now ASHRAE Standard 202\, which together defines the modern foundation for the BECx process. Yet\, in practice\, many designers still omit Building Enclosure Specification 01-91-15 (or 01-91-19 under the Whole Building Design Guide framework)\, leaving owners without clear direction on who conducts or verifies enclosure testing.This session equips attendees with a practical understanding of how to align specifications with current standards\, define roles and responsibilities\, and integrate enclosure testing as the final functional performance verification of the enclosure system. Using real-world project examples\, we’ll explore common ASTM and AAMA testing protocols—such as window spray testing (AAMA 501.2)\, chamber testing (ASTM 1105/783)\, and whole-building pressurization (ASTM E779) as tools within the larger commissioning process.By the end of this session\, participants will gain a clear\, current framework for discussing BECx and BET with owners\, designers\, and contractors\, establishing a shared language to deliver durable\, efficient\, and high-performing building envelopes. \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Learning Objectives: \n\nLearn the differences between BE Commissioning and BE Testing. \nUnderstand how Owner Project Requirements relate to design decisions affecting function performance testing of the Enclosure\nDevelop a common basis for discussing Building Enclosure testing methods with the AEC Team.\nUnderstand how the Building Enclosure Commissioning process incorporate Enclosure Testing as the final Functional Performance Test of the various Enclosure Systems.\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Mike Lackey\, LCCx\n Mike Lackey is a Professional Engineer and Certified Building Enclosure Commissioning Professional with over 35 years of experience in building systems performance and commissioning. As Principal of LCCx\, he has led numerous complex projects across Texas\, including stadiums\, healthcare facilities\, higher education campuses\, and major government buildings. Mike’s leadership focuses on ensuring that building systems performed as intended\, delivering the efficiency\, comfort\, and reliability owners expect. URL:https://abaaconference.com/event/building-enclosure-commissioning-vs-enclosure-testing/ LOCATION:Lakeshore Ballroom CATEGORIES:Tuesday May 5 ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://abaaconference.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/IA-Mike.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T121500 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T131500 DTSTAMP:20260505T094321 CREATED:20260120T090652Z LAST-MODIFIED:20260128T181535Z UID:10000052-1777983300-1777986900@abaaconference.com SUMMARY:Exhibit Hall Open & Lunch DESCRIPTION:Tuesday\, MAY 5\, 12:15PM-1:15PM URL:https://abaaconference.com/event/exhibit-hall-open-lunch/ LOCATION:Nicollet Ballroom & Promenade CATEGORIES:Tuesday May 5 ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://abaaconference.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/Lunch-Exhibit-Hall-Open.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T131500 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T141500 DTSTAMP:20260505T094321 CREATED:20260120T005127Z LAST-MODIFIED:20260126T154100Z UID:10000035-1777986900-1777990500@abaaconference.com SUMMARY:Shadow Box Design - To Vent or Not to Vent DESCRIPTION:Presentation Overview\n \n \n \n \n \n Tuesday\, MAY 5\, 1:15PM-2:15PMLakeshore Ballroom\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Shadow boxes are commonly used in curtain wall construction but can be problematic if not designed and detailed correctly and appropriately for the climate. Much has been written about shadow box design\, both successes and failures\, but there is no consensus about how\, or if\, the cavity should be vented. There have been 3 primary approaches to treating the cavity between the glazing and the shadow box back pan: venting directly to the exterior environment\, venting directly to the interior building environment and sealing the cavity. Venting the cavity directly to either the exterior or the interior building environment introduces moisture- and particulate-laden air that can condense under certain climatic conditions and will likely deposit dust and debris on the interior surfaces of the cavity\, creating both permanent and temporary aesthetic concerns. When venting to the exterior\, cold\, winter air is allowed inside the cavity and on the interior side of the thermal break\, potentially cooling the perimeter mullions to a point where condensation will form on their interior surfaces. Sealing the cavity eliminates both of these issues\, but there is some evidence that heat and pressure may build up to a point where it could damage the glass and degrade the sealants and coatings inside the cavity. After considering all of the options\, a modified version of venting to the exterior appears to address most of the issues. This approach vents the cavity into the vertical mullions\, which ultimately connect to the exterior environment\, but do so indirectly\, relieving the heat and pressure but also somewhat tempering the exterior air that is allowed to enter. \n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Learning Objectives: \n\nDescribe the primary applications for shadow box assemblies in curtain wall systems\nDiscuss the most common reasons why shadow box assemblies fail\nIdentify the primary ventilation strategies for curtain wall shadow box assemblies\nUnderstand the pros and cons of different ventilation strategies for curtain wall shadow box assemblies\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Mark Walsh\, Perkins & Will\n Mark is an architect with thirty years of experience in design and coordination for all phases of project design and delivery\, from programming and pre-design through construction contract administration. Mark’s experience includes numerous project types\, including higher education\, K-12 education\, corporate\, commercial\, civil\, cultural\, transportation\, healthcare\, science and technology\, sports and recreation and corporate interiors.As Perkins&Will’s Firmwide Director of Technical Design\, Mark focuses on developing a culture that delivers design and technical excellence while embracing innovative delivery and construction techniques and seeking to improve efficiency across all aspects of the Firm’s work. Mark also chairs the Firm’s Project Delivery Council and Firmwide Technical Design Community.Mark is a co-founder of the Perkins&Will Innovation Incubator and has been an active member of the selection and oversight committee since the program’s inception in 2010. URL:https://abaaconference.com/event/shadow-box-design-to-vent-or-not-to-vent/ LOCATION:Lakeshore Ballroom CATEGORIES:Tuesday May 5 ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://abaaconference.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/IA-Mark.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T131500 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T141500 DTSTAMP:20260505T094321 CREATED:20260120T024249Z LAST-MODIFIED:20260206T171935Z UID:10000040-1777986900-1777990500@abaaconference.com SUMMARY:Building Enclosure Architectural Details - Conveying Construction Drawing Clarity DESCRIPTION:Presentation Overview\n \n \n \n \n \n Tuesday\, MAY 5\, 1:1PM-2:15PMNicollet Ballroom\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Designing an air-tight\, water-tight\, and energy-efficient building requires an understanding of the anatomy of the entire building enclosure to build structures that will perform as intended. A lack of understanding of these concepts translates into poor and incomplete architectural details\, gaps in design information\, and exterior wall components that cannot be properly installed\, leading to contractors figuring it out on the field. This presentation will touch upon basic concepts of building science and how drawings can be improved to create beautiful\, sustainable structures that function properly\, by conveying clarity on building enclosure details at foundation-to-wall\, roof-to-wall\, window-to-wall\, penetrations\, and dissimilar material transition points. \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Learning Objectives: \n\nAcquire a clear understanding of the importance of building enclosure architectural details and the consequences of not illustrating essential details as part of construction documents.\nUnderstand what exterior wall envelope details must be provided in construction documents\, and interpret how this translates into their design to meet the code.\nProduce building enclosure design details that utilize and recognize building science practices resulting in sustainable buildings.\nRecognize how materials and sequencing can play into the constructability of the systems\, and apply this knowledge to enclosure design to avoid premature failure.\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Robert Dazel\, Tremco Construction Products Group Inc\n Robert Dazel has been a registered Architect in the State of Ohio since 1992\, a long-standing member of American Institute of Architects (AIA)\, Construction Specifications Institute (CSI) and maintains his Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Associate (GA) credentials. \nUnder his current role as a Senior Building Enclosure Specialist\, Robert focuses on all six-sides of a building envelope through assessment and diagnostics leading to development of comprehensive solutions directly addressing the challenges and pain points experienced by building owners in all market segments. \nHis professional experience as an architect\, consultant\, educator\, manufacturer’s representative\, and industry association advocate has allowed him to become an authority and expert on exterior building envelope performance\, code(s) compliance\, material testing\, compatibility\, design\, detailing\, specification\, and solution execution. URL:https://abaaconference.com/event/building-enclosure-architectural-details-converying-construction-drawing-clarity/ LOCATION:Nicollet Ballroom CATEGORIES:Tuesday May 5 ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://abaaconference.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/Foundational-Robert.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T141500 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T143000 DTSTAMP:20260505T094321 CREATED:20260120T090919Z LAST-MODIFIED:20260128T181539Z UID:10000053-1777990500-1777991400@abaaconference.com SUMMARY:Exhibit Hall Open & Break DESCRIPTION:Tuesday\, MAY 5\, 2:15PM-2:30PM URL:https://abaaconference.com/event/exhibit-hall-open-break-3/ LOCATION:Nicollet Ballroom & Promenade CATEGORIES:Tuesday May 5 ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://abaaconference.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/Break-Exhibit-Hall-Open.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T143000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T153000 DTSTAMP:20260505T094321 CREATED:20260116T033437Z LAST-MODIFIED:20260430T183851Z UID:10000029-1777991400-1777995000@abaaconference.com SUMMARY:Pressure Sensitive Adhesives and Their Use in the Building Enclosure DESCRIPTION:Presentation Overview\n \n \n \n \n \n Tuesday\, MAY 5\, 2:30PM -3:30PMNicollet Ballroom\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Pressure sensitive adhesives (PSAs) play a pivotal role in advancing air barrier technologies within building enclosures\, meeting the evolving demands for high-performance\, energy-efficient structures. This session will focus specifically on the air barrier industry\, providing an in-depth overview of the main types of PSAs used in these applications—acrylic\, rubber-based\, silicone\, and asphalt formulations. Each type will be examined for its distinct properties\, compatibility with substrates commonly found in air barrier systems\, and ability to withstand environmental stresses.The presentation will highlight how PSAs contribute to the integrity and effectiveness of air barrier assemblies\, including their use in self-adhered membranes\, flashing tapes\, window and door interfaces\, and critical detail areas that require airtight seals. Discussion will emphasize how PSAs simplify installation processes\, reduce labor time\, and help achieve superior air leakage control\, which is vital for modern building performance and compliance. \nBenefits of various PSA systems will be evaluated\, showcasing their capacity to form robust bonds without mechanical fastening\, their resilience when faced with building movement\, temperature fluctuations\, and moisture\, and their flexibility in adapting to complex architectural details. Special attention will be given to how these advantages translate into improved energy efficiency\, indoor air quality\, and long-term durability of air barrier systems. \nThe session will also explore essential evaluation methods for PSA performance in air barrier applications\, such as peel strength\, shear and tack testing\, accelerated aging\, and exposure to cycles of temperature and humidity. These methods are crucial for ensuring that PSAs meet the stringent requirements of the air barrier industry and deliver consistent results in the field. \nThis session is designed for air barrier professionals\, specifiers\, installers\, and building scientists seeking to deepen their understanding of pressure sensitive adhesives and their critical role in delivering high-performance building enclosures. \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Learning Objectives: \n\nIdentify and describe the main types of pressure sensitive adhesives (PSAs) used in air barrier systems\, including acrylic\, rubber-based\, silicone\, and asphalt formulations\, and explain their unique properties and substrate compatibility.\nAnalyze the role of PSAs in enhancing the integrity\, installation efficiency\, and overall performance of air barrier assemblies\, with particular focus on their application in self-adhered membranes\, flashing tapes\, and critical airtight detailing.\nEvaluate the benefits of PSA systems in building enclosures\, such as robust bonding without mechanical fastening\, resilience to building movement and environmental stresses\, and their contribution to energy efficiency\, indoor air quality\, and durability.\nUnderstand and apply key performance evaluation methods for PSAs—including peel strength\, shear and tack testing\, and accelerated aging—to ensure compliance with air barrier industry standards and reliable field performance.\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Cody Shelner\, Siplast\n Cody Shelner is a leading expert in pressure sensitive adhesives and self-adhered membrane technologies\, recognized for his innovative contributions to the construction materials industry. Holding a degree in Mechanical Engineering\, Cody began his career designing environmental test equipment and developing advanced testing methods for adhesive product performance. His technical background and problem-solving skills have enabled him to collaborate with manufacturers\, researchers\, and industry professionals\, focusing on improving the effectiveness and durability of self-adhered membrane systems.Cody specializes in evaluating and testing adhesives used in self-adhered membranes\, having conducted extensive research to develop sophisticated methodologies that assess performance under a variety of forces and environmental conditions. He emphasizes the importance of comprehensive evaluations that go beyond standard peel adhesion tests\, advocating for the consideration of shear forces\, temperature changes\, and external loads in performance assessments.Beyond his technical work\, Cody is actively involved in industry associations and committees\, helping to establish standards and best practices for adhesive performance. His peers recognize him as a trusted advisor and thought leader in the field. Driven by a commitment to innovation and collaboration\, Cody continues to shape the future of construction materials through his expertise and dedication to industry advancement. URL:https://abaaconference.com/event/pressure-sensitive-adhesives-and-their-use-in-the-building-enclosure/ LOCATION:Nicollet Ballroom CATEGORIES:Tuesday May 5 ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://abaaconference.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/Foundational-Cody.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T143000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T153000 DTSTAMP:20260505T094321 CREATED:20260120T002438Z LAST-MODIFIED:20260319T015052Z UID:10000034-1777991400-1777995000@abaaconference.com SUMMARY:Trade Partner Success depends on Quality Metrics and an Effective Quality Program DESCRIPTION:Presentation Overview\n \n \n \n \n \n Tuesday\, MAY 5\, 2:30PM-3:30PMLakeshore Ballroom\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n In today’s environment\, having the trade partners take responsibility for the quality of their work and coordination with other trade partners that affect their work is critical for a successful project. Keeping quality on track with trackable and quantifiable quality metrics and deliverables is what we have been able to use to keep the Cost of Quality at almost 10x less than industry average per industry reports. Making everyone accountable for Quality and at the same time providing them with a resource\, learning experience during job site reviews\, and providing a lessons-learned program that is introduced at the right time during design\, buyout or construction\, will give everyone more confidence and acknowledge the Trade Partner is a Partner long term. Also\, using AI technology along with quality metric results over many years\, we are now able to assist with the choice towards the correct trade partner for the project along with the making sure that the trade partner will succeed at the specific project type. I have developed an extensive set of Quality metrics and Lessons Learned programs that is effective and definable for the Company and the individual trade partner teams.  This presentation will review what goes into an effective Quality Program and its deliverables to the company\, trade partner project teams\, and Ownership. \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Learning Objectives: \n\nDefine what a quality plan is and how it could help the trade partner and the entire construction team with expectations and accountability.\nApply the understanding of the Trade Partner Quality Plan to the project to better manage the trade partner and overall project expectations.\nLeverage Quality metrics\, how to measure\, and how to make them useful for the Company\, Subcontractor\, A/E and Owner.\nUnderstand the importance of trade partnering and training verses acknowledging a transactional relationship.\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Corey Zussman\, AIA\, NCARB\, ALA (IL\, IN\, WI) RBEC\, RRC\, REWC\, RWC\, RRO\, CABS\, CDT CQM\, CxA+BE\, BECxP\, LEED AP BD+C Level II Thermographer\, QA/QC Vice President\, AECOM Hunt\n As a forensic architect registered in several states\, Corey Zussman has practiced in the construction industry for more than 30 years. He specializes in the building envelope\, restoration\, preservation\, life safety\, and interior finishes. While working on over 2000 projects\, Corey conducts constructability reviews\, pre-installation meetings\, comprehensive envelope meetings\, and construction observations. He has also become known for providing educational opportunities throughout the industry and has produced more than 200 “lessons learned” papers. Topics include building envelope and life safety concerns\, enabling Corey to proactively address issues during design review\, pre-construction\, and construction. In addition\, he has over 15 industry articles about building envelope\, life safety\, and interior topics. He is also a frequent presenter at local and national conferences and associations with over 60 AIA accredited presentations. URL:https://abaaconference.com/event/trade-partner-success-depends-on-quality-metrics-and-an-effective-quality-program/ LOCATION:Lakeshore Ballroom CATEGORIES:Tuesday May 5 ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://abaaconference.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/IA-Corey.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T153000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T160000 DTSTAMP:20260505T094321 CREATED:20260120T091030Z LAST-MODIFIED:20260129T214415Z UID:10000054-1777995000-1777996800@abaaconference.com SUMMARY:Exhibit Hall Open & Break DESCRIPTION:Tuesday\, MAY 5\, 3:30PM-4:00PM URL:https://abaaconference.com/event/exhibit-hall-open-break-4/ LOCATION:Nicollet Ballroom & Promenade CATEGORIES:Tuesday May 5 ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://abaaconference.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/Break-Exhibit-Hall-Open.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T160000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T170000 DTSTAMP:20260505T094321 CREATED:20260119T223449Z LAST-MODIFIED:20260126T153541Z UID:10000030-1777996800-1778000400@abaaconference.com SUMMARY:The Who\, What\, When\, Where and Why of Waterproofing DESCRIPTION:Presentation Overview\n \n \n \n \n \n Tuesday\, MAY 5\, 4:00PM-5:00PMNicollet Ballroom\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n  The presentation will provide a basic overview of below grade and elevated deck waterproofing and associated drainage systems. The difference between waterproofing systems and other building enclosure barrier systems is explored. An overview of the different types of waterproofing and their installation techniques is included. Several critical transitions to surrounding systems are identified and details are reviewed. The presentation concludes with some humorous examples of how the as-built condition does not always match the design assumptions. \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Learning Objectives: \n\nLocating the portions of the building enclosure that require waterproofing systems\nIdentify the available types of waterproofing and associated drainage systems\nTechniques for filed performance testing of waterproofing systems.\nChallenges associated with detailing and installing waterproofing and associated drainage systems.\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n John Posenecker\, Terracon Consultants\n Mr. Posenecker is the Senior Principal and the Building Enclosure Practice Leader for Terracon Consultants\, Inc. He is a registered engineer in the State of Texas and Oklahoma. His experience includes design\, construction\, testing and diagnostic investigation of building envelope systems. Previously he spent 10 years with a large regional waterproofing and roofing contractor\, 8 years with an acoustic specialty contractor\, and 15 years in the commercial nuclear power industry. Throughout his career\, Mr. Posenecker has participated in a wide variety of projects associated with the building envelope and he specializes in waterproofing. He is the Vice Chair of the National Building Enclosure Council and is a board member for the Air Barrier Association of America (ABAA) and the ABAA Standards Institute (ASI). URL:https://abaaconference.com/event/the-who-what-when-where-and-why-of-waterproofing/ LOCATION:Nicollet Ballroom CATEGORIES:Tuesday May 5 ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://abaaconference.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/Foundational-John.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T160000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T170000 DTSTAMP:20260505T094321 CREATED:20260120T010348Z LAST-MODIFIED:20260126T153323Z UID:10000036-1777996800-1778000400@abaaconference.com SUMMARY:Critical Mass: Scaling Passive House at Bunker Hill DESCRIPTION:Presentation Overview\n \n \n \n \n \n Tuesday\, MAY 5\, 4:00PM-5:00PMLakeshore Ballroom\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n In response to the dual challenges of a regional housing shortage and the urgent need for climate resilience\, Leggat McCall Properties has committed to an ambitious initiative: achieving Passive House certification across all 15 buildings of the Bunker Hill Housing redevelopment in Boston. This commitment was made proactively—before Massachusetts building codes required such standards—positioning the project as a model for low operational-carbon\, equitable urban development.The Bunker Hill Housing project will deliver 2\,699 mixed-rate housing units\, replacing outdated\, low-density public housing with a vibrant\, energy-efficient community. The development spans buildings ranging from six to ten stories\, each designed to meet Passive House standards.To address the scale of this undertaking\, the project team developed a “kit of parts” strategy\, consisting of precast concrete cores\, 62 foot long CLT plank floors\, spanning the entire width of the building\, bearing upon a panelized\, fully clad wall system. This approach creates an economy of scale that enables more housing to be delivered more efficiently and affordably.Building M\, a 100% affordable unit building and the first building in the development\, served as the test case for this strategy. Through early-phase design coordination\, performance mock up testing\, and ongoing team coordination across the design and construction phases\, the team established a replicable framework that integrates Passive House requirements with construction workflows that allow on site-efficiency. Building M was completed from slab-on-grade to occupancy in 16 months. This presentation will explore how the Bunker Hill team leveraged early-phase design coordination\, prefabrication\, and Passive House certification to optimize both cost and operational carbon reduction. We will share lessons learned from Building M\, including early-phase explorations and decisions around envelope detailing and construction sequencing. \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Learning Objectives: \n\nAnalyze the Strategic Rationale for Proactive Passive House Adoption in Large-Scale Housing\nEvaluate Enclosure Prefabrication and Assembly Methods for Passive House Scalability\nDetail the project workflow for Integrating Passive House and building enclosure control layer requirements\nIdentify Lessons Learned in Envelope Detailing and Construction Sequencing for High-Performance Enclosures\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Andrew Steingiser\, RDH Building Science\n Andrew is the Passive House lead in RDH’s Boston office. Andrew engages building owners and design teams as an early-phase design partner\, consulting with them on scalable climate-resilient solutions. An expert on local and regional regulations\, he champions operational and embodied carbon reduction of the built environment through resilient\, and future-proof buildings. URL:https://abaaconference.com/event/critical-mass-scaling-passive-house-at-bunker-hill/ LOCATION:Lakeshore Ballroom CATEGORIES:Tuesday May 5 ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://abaaconference.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/IA-Andrew.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T180000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260505T210000 DTSTAMP:20260505T094321 CREATED:20260120T091221Z LAST-MODIFIED:20260128T170718Z UID:10000055-1778004000-1778014800@abaaconference.com SUMMARY:Board Meet & Greet DESCRIPTION:Tuesday\, MAY 5\, 6:00PM-9:00PM URL:https://abaaconference.com/event/board-meet-greet/ LOCATION:Prairie Kitchen & Bar\, MN CATEGORIES:Tuesday May 5 ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://abaaconference.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/Board-Meet-Greet-1.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260506T070000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260506T080000 DTSTAMP:20260505T094321 CREATED:20260120T091704Z LAST-MODIFIED:20260128T181551Z UID:10000057-1778050800-1778054400@abaaconference.com SUMMARY:Exhibit Hall Open & Buffet Hot Breakfast DESCRIPTION:Wednesday\, MAY 6\, 7:00AM-8:00AM URL:https://abaaconference.com/event/exhibit-hall-open-buffet-hot-breakfast/ LOCATION:Nicollet Ballroom & Promenade CATEGORIES:Wednesday May 6 ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://abaaconference.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/Hot-Breakfast-Exhibit-Hall-Open.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260506T080000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260506T090000 DTSTAMP:20260505T094321 CREATED:20260120T092522Z LAST-MODIFIED:20260430T185919Z UID:10000062-1778054400-1778058000@abaaconference.com SUMMARY:Keynote Session - When There's Something Strange and Your Enclosure Fails\, Who You Gonna Call? Your Insurance Company DESCRIPTION:Presentation Overview\n \n \n \n \n \n Wednesday\, MAY 6\, 8:00AM-9:00AMNicollet Ballroom\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n On today’s projects\, contractors and trades are asked to interpret incomplete details\, suggest substitutions\, support testing\, and troubleshoot performance issues—often under schedule pressure. Those day-to-day decisions can create liability when a loss occurs and trigger insurance coverages such as Builder’s Risk\, General Liability\, and Professional Liability. \nThis session outlines key differences among these coverages\, highlights common factors that can jeopardize them\, and uses scenario-based examples to help professionals identify early red flags. It also connects these concepts to field practices—such as structured reporting\, quality verification\, and effective project documentation—that reduce rework\, minimize disputes\, and clearly demonstrate what work was performed\, when\, and why. \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Learning Objectives: \n\nDistinguish how Builder’s Risk\, General Liability\, and Professional Liability respond to losses\nIdentify when air barrier scope can drift into “professional services” exposure\nApply “claim vs. circumstance” decision-making to preserve claims-made coverage\nImplement documentation and post-loss practices that improve coverage positioning and reduce dispute time\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Mary Kilnay\, General Counsel\, American Contractors Insurance Group\n Ms. Kilany joined ACIG in April 2019. Prior to joining ACIG\, she served as a partner in the law firm Savrick\, Schumann\, Johnson\, McGarr\, Kaminski & Shirley\, where she represented national commercial primary and excess insurance companies as coverage counsel on construction defect\, bodily injury\, products liability\, and business-related claims. Ms. Kilany has experience advising on a variety of contract and insurance related matters\, including contractual risk transfer issues\, additional insured issues\, commercial general liability claims\, commercial property claims\, and auto and garagekeepers claims. She holds a Bachelor’s degree in Economics from Central College and Juris Doctor from the University of Iowa. \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Brian Callaghan\, CPCU\, ARM\, ARe\, CRIS\, Vice President - Risk Management\, American Contractors Insurance Group\n Mr. Callaghan joined ACIG in 2018. He began his professional career at Zurich North America as an underwriter in the construction industry segment focusing on primary and excess construction casualty insurance. He has continued to specialize in construction risk with experience in contractor-controlled insurance programs and subcontractor default insurance. Prior to joining ACIG\, he worked at Swiss Re. Mr. Callaghan holds a bachelor’s degree in business with an emphasis in risk management & insurance from The University of Georgia. His continuing education in insurance includes the Charted Property Casualty Underwriter\, Associate in Reinsurance\, and Construction Risk and Insurance Specialist designations. URL:https://abaaconference.com/event/keynote-session/ LOCATION:Nicollet Ballroom CATEGORIES:Wednesday May 6 ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://abaaconference.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/03/Keynote-Session.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260506T090000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260506T091500 DTSTAMP:20260505T094321 CREATED:20260120T091852Z LAST-MODIFIED:20260128T181554Z UID:10000058-1778058000-1778058900@abaaconference.com SUMMARY:Exhibit Hall Open & Break DESCRIPTION:Wednesday\, MAY 6\, 9:00AM-9:15AM URL:https://abaaconference.com/event/exhibit-hall-open-break-5/ LOCATION:Nicollet Ballroom & Promenade CATEGORIES:Wednesday May 6 ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://abaaconference.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/Break-Exhibit-Hall-Open.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260506T091500 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260506T101500 DTSTAMP:20260505T094321 CREATED:20260120T013522Z LAST-MODIFIED:20260411T020802Z UID:10000037-1778058900-1778062500@abaaconference.com SUMMARY:Bridging Old and New: Best Practices for Building Envelope Tie-Ins DESCRIPTION:Presentation Overview\n \n \n \n \n \n Wednesday\, MAY 6\, 9:15AM-10:15AMNicollet Ballroom\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Successfully integrating new buildings with tie-ins into existing structures presents unique challenges especially when it comes to ensuring the performance and continuity of the building envelope. This technical presentation explores the design and evaluation strategies required to create durable\, technically sound connections between new and existing wall and roof systems. \nAttendees will begin by analyzing and comparing the functional characteristics of key exterior wall design types\, including mass\, transitional\, barrier\, drainage\, and rainscreen systems. The session will also explore the differences between conventional and protected membrane roofing assemblies in low-slope roofs applications\, focusing on performance implications relevant to new-to-existing roof tie-ins. \nTo support successful design decisions\, participants will learn how to assess\, document\, and verify the construction and condition of existing walls and roofing systems. Emphasis will be placed on identifying key control layers (air\, water\, vapor\, and thermal) and understanding how they interact within existing assemblies. \nThe presentation will focus on applying building envelope design fundamentals to the development of successful tie-ins between new buildings and existing structures. Strategies will be provided to ensure continuity across all control layers\, minimize the risk of air leakage\, moisture-related and thermal issues\, and accommodate differing construction types\, material differences\, and movement accommodations. \nBy the end of the session\, participants will be equipped with practical knowledge to evaluate existing conditions and confidently design new wall and roof transitions to existing structures that preserve the integrity and performance of the complete building envelope. \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Learning Objectives: \n\nAnalyze and compare the key features and functional differences among mass\, transitional\, barrier\, drainage\, and rainscreen exterior wall designs.\nReview assembly and performance differences between conventional and protected membrane (inverted) roofing designs.\nAssess\, document\, and verify the types of existing exterior walls and roofing systems using appropriate evaluation techniques.\nApply design fundamentals to develop technically sound new wall and roof tie-ins to existing structures\, ensuring continuity of control layers.\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Mike Nagle\, CannonDesign\n As a Senior Technical Leader in building enclosures at CannonDesign\, Michael Nagle leads the firm’s enclosure team\, drives the development of internal standards\, conducts technical quality reviews\, and delivers in-house training focused on building science principles and enclosure design best practices. Since joining CannonDesign in January 2022\, he has been instrumental in elevating the firm’s technical capabilities in enclosure systems. \nMichael brings nearly two decades of experience from a leading building enclosure consulting firm\, where he specialized in diagnosing complex enclosure issues such as water and air infiltration\, condensation\, and material distress across a wide range of systems. In addition\, he has conducted numerous condition assessments and developed repair\, restoration\, and preservation strategies for both existing and historic buildings\, spanning from the mid-19th century to the present day. URL:https://abaaconference.com/event/bridging-old-and-new-best-practices-for-building-envelope-tie-ins-2/ LOCATION:Nicollet Ballroom CATEGORIES:Wednesday May 6 ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://abaaconference.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/Foundational-Mike.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260506T091500 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260506T101500 DTSTAMP:20260505T094322 CREATED:20260120T025016Z LAST-MODIFIED:20260126T152851Z UID:10000041-1778058900-1778062500@abaaconference.com SUMMARY:Marching Towards Mainstream: A General Contractor's Perspective on Industry Adoption of Enclosure Commissioning and Consulting DESCRIPTION:Presentation Overview\n \n \n \n \n \n Wednesday\, MAY 6\, 9:15AM-10:15AMLakeshore Ballroom\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Over time\, the adoption of Building Enclosure Consulting and Building Enclosure Commissioning (BECx) continues to push further into the mainstream Architecture\, Engineering and Construction (AEC) Industry. As with any changes that occur in the AEC Industry\, evolution of practices can at times seem slow or challenging. Future states of practice can turn out different than anticipated for each of the effected stakeholders. \nIn this presentation\, a midstream review of Building Enclosure Consulting and BECx industry adoption will be offered from the perspective of a Commercial General Contractor. Topics such as what is working well and what isn’t will be discussed. Potential lessons from the incorporation of Special Inspections & Testing (SI&T)\, and from Mechanical\, Electrical and Plumbing Commissioning (MEPCx) into the industry will be offered as guideposts for the future. With consideration to prevailing AEC project delivery methods\, recommendations for maximizing Building Enclosure Consulting’s and BECx’s future value proposition will be suggested. \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Learning Objectives: \n\nParticipants will identify parallels between the past adoption of SI&T/MEPCx and the current state of adoption of BECx\nParticipants will recognize how project delivery methods combined with third party Enclosure Consultants can result in project-level friction points\nParticipants will be able to compare adoption outcomes between code-driven and client-driven requirements\nParticipants will assess shortcomings specific to current project delivery methods and how Enclosure Specialists can fill those gaps\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Jon Porter\, Kraus Anderson Construction\n Jon Porter is the Director of Building Science at Kraus Anderson Construction. In his role at KA\, Jon focuses on building performance\, with particular focus on the exterior enclosure and substrates. He serves as a technical resource to project teams in relation to means and methods\, constructability\, building materials technology\, workflow and sequencing\, proper installation techniques\, and testing and acceptance protocols. A licensed Professional Engineer in the State of Minnesota\, Jon has 30 years of design and construction experience\, including roles in forensic investigation of design and construction failures and as an owner’s representative. URL:https://abaaconference.com/event/marching-towards-mainstream-a-general-contractors-perspective-on-industry-adoption-of-enclosure-commissioning-and-consulting-2/ LOCATION:Lakeshore Ballroom CATEGORIES:Wednesday May 6 ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://abaaconference.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/IA-Jon.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260506T101500 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260506T103000 DTSTAMP:20260505T094322 CREATED:20260120T092014Z LAST-MODIFIED:20260128T181557Z UID:10000059-1778062500-1778063400@abaaconference.com SUMMARY:Exhibit Hall Open & Break DESCRIPTION:Wednesday\, MAY 6\, 10:15AM-10:30AM URL:https://abaaconference.com/event/exhibit-hall-open-break-6/ LOCATION:Nicollet Ballroom & Promenade CATEGORIES:Wednesday May 6 ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://abaaconference.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/Break-Exhibit-Hall-Open.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260506T103000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260506T113000 DTSTAMP:20260505T094322 CREATED:20260120T092740Z LAST-MODIFIED:20260319T032322Z UID:10000063-1778063400-1778067000@abaaconference.com SUMMARY:Contractor's Panel: Strategies for Achieving Accurate Scopes and Bids DESCRIPTION:Presentation Overview\n \n \n \n \n \n Wednesday\, MAY 6\, 10:30AM-11:30AMNicollet Ballroom\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n This is part 1 of Bid It Right: Inside Information from the Pros\, a series of best practices.  \nEvery project manager who’s run a few air barrier / WRB jobs has a mental list of lessons learned the hard way—where bids go sideways\, sequencing breaks down\, and “small” scope gaps turn into big schedule and margin hits. This candid panel distills those lessons into practical strategies you can use immediately: the “Three S’s” (Specs\, Scope of Work\, Schedule)\, bid language that holds up in GC bid leveling\, smart use of allowances vs. hidden contingency\, and what really happens when GCs normalize bids and weigh qualifications\, exclusions\, and alternates. Expect real examples\, straight talk\, and an interactive Q&A where attendees can bring “what would you do?” scenarios. You’ll leave with takeaways that reduce surprises\, tighten scopes\, and help protect profit on your next project. \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Learning Objectives: \n\nUse the “Three S’s” (Specs\, Scope of Work\, Schedule) to prevent the most common bid-to-field breakdowns by spotting spec/detail conflicts early\, defining who owns each interface\, and aligning sequencing before work starts.\nProtect your number from low-ballers by making risk visible (and comparable) in bid leveling: clearly call out scope gaps/constructability issues\, tie them to specific drawings/spec sections\, and present them as quantified allowances/alternates rather than buried assumptions—so a GC can’t “wish away” real exposure.\nBuild a defensible contingency approach for unknowns\, “known-but-not-shown” conditions\, and QA/QAP requirements by deciding what belongs in base scope vs. allowance vs. future add\, and by avoiding hidden contingency that muddies comparisons and triggers “sharpen the pencil” pressure.\nGet a “fly on the wall” view of how GCs evaluate bids—and how to win on clarity\, not just price by understanding how bids are normalized (scope\, allowances\, qualifications\, exclusions\, alternates) and how emerging AI-assisted review can quickly flag misalignments between bids\, specs\, and drawings.\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Corey Zussman\, AIA\, NCARB\, ALA (IL\, IN\, WI) RBEC\, RRC\, REWC\, RWC\, RRO\, CABS\, CDT CQM\, CxA+BE\, BECxP\, LEED AP BD+C Level II Thermographer\, QA/QC Vice President\, AECOM Hunt\n As a forensic architect registered in several states\, Corey Zussman has practiced in the construction industry for over 30 years. He specializes in the building envelope\, restoration\, preservation\, life safety\, and interior finishes. While working on over 2000 projects\, Corey conducts constructability reviews\, pre-installation meetings\, comprehensive envelope meetings\, and construction observations. He has also become known for providing educational opportunities throughout the industry and has produced more than 200 “lessons learned” papers.  Topics include building envelope and life safety concerns\, enabling Corey to proactively address issues during design review\, pre-construction\, and construction. In addition\, he has over 15 industry articles about building envelope and life safety topics. He is also a frequent presenter at local and national conferences and associations with over 50 AIA accredited presentations. \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Michael Repka\, Hoffman Construction\n Michael joined Hoffman Construction Company 16 years ago after practicing architecture for 10 years in Seattle and the surrounding area. In his years of practice\, he developed the firm’s Quality Plan and executed internal Quality Reviews as a Project Architect\, Project Manager\, and Partner. \nAfter joining Hoffman Construction in 2006\, he worked on project sites coordinating subcontractors and installations\, learning all the ways the details he had drawn as an architect were actually being installed. His architectural background and consistent focus on quality made him an ideal Quality Manager; first on project sites\, and now corporately\, helping to devise and implement a company-wide Quality system. He believes planning is the key to Quality\, and is focused on Design Document Reviews in preconstruction as the earliest opportunity to control Quality on the construction site. \nMichael has experience in many building types\, high rise towers to below grade transit stations\, and with GCCM and Design Build project delivery methods\, as both an architect and contractor. A proud building science and sustainability geek\, he completed the design and build of his own net-zero house in 2021. \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Paul Grahovac\, PROSOCO\n Paul Grahovac has been active in the construction industry for 30 years –first as a construction defects trial lawyer and later as corporate counsel and an expert in barrier technology. He also spent 10 years in technology development at a national lab. \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Matt Giambrone\, OCP Contractors\n Matt was born into the construction industry as his father successfully ran a masonry company in Cleveland\, Ohio\, for 35 years. Matt became an apprentice bricklayer in 2001\, successfully completed training\, and became a journeyman. In 2009\, Matt studied blueprint reading and estimates by hand. In 2010\, Matt became a Level 3 Certified ABAA installer in fluid-applied\, self-adhered\, and spray foam. With the passing of his father in 2013\, Matt started at OCP Contractors\, starting up their division 7 group. In 2016\, Matt became the Chairman of the Contractors; a few years later\, he became a Board of Director for the ABAA\, and in 2021\, Matt also became a member of the Executive Committee. URL:https://abaaconference.com/event/contractors-panel-strategies-for-achieving-accurate-scopes-and-bids/ LOCATION:Nicollet Ballroom CATEGORIES:Wednesday May 6 ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://abaaconference.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/Contractors-Panel.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260506T113000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260506T120000 DTSTAMP:20260505T094322 CREATED:20260120T093037Z LAST-MODIFIED:20260126T180130Z UID:10000064-1778067000-1778068800@abaaconference.com SUMMARY:Awards Ceremony DESCRIPTION:Wednesday\, MAY 6\, 11:30AM-12:00PM URL:https://abaaconference.com/event/awards-ceremony/ LOCATION:Nicollet Ballroom CATEGORIES:Wednesday May 6 ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://abaaconference.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/Award-Ceremony.png END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR